<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 773 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389890</link>
    <description>The Court directed the respondents not to enforce the penalty demand until the Tribunal/Appellate Authority proceedings conclude for the assessment year in question, as per the demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Act. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing that penalty is not automatic and the Assessing Officer must consider the petitioner&#039;s application for stay of demand pending Tribunal/Appellate Authority decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:51:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 773 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389890</link>
      <description>The Court directed the respondents not to enforce the penalty demand until the Tribunal/Appellate Authority proceedings conclude for the assessment year in question, as per the demand notice issued under Section 156 of the Act. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, emphasizing that penalty is not automatic and the Assessing Officer must consider the petitioner&#039;s application for stay of demand pending Tribunal/Appellate Authority decisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>