<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 765 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389882</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2010-11. It found that the addition under section 69 was not legally sound due to lack of proper notice and verification, violation of natural justice principles, and failure to establish unrecorded investments. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition under section 69, partly allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:43:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 765 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389882</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) for the assessment year 2010-11. It found that the addition under section 69 was not legally sound due to lack of proper notice and verification, violation of natural justice principles, and failure to establish unrecorded investments. The Tribunal directed the deletion of the addition under section 69, partly allowing the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389882</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>