<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 762 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under section 54 for the second flat. The Tribunal held that the appellant, despite mistakenly claiming deduction under section 54F, was entitled to the deduction under section 54 as both the transferred and received flats were residential. The claim for deduction under section 54F was dismissed as redundant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:41:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 762 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to allow the deduction under section 54 for the second flat. The Tribunal held that the appellant, despite mistakenly claiming deduction under section 54F, was entitled to the deduction under section 54 as both the transferred and received flats were residential. The claim for deduction under section 54F was dismissed as redundant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>