<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 760 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389877</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment order, confirming the treatment of short-term capital gains as business income due to the systematic trading approach of the assessee. The disallowance of expenses was reduced to 15%, and an additional ground regarding income from house property was dismissed as already addressed by the CIT(A). The appeal of the assessee was ultimately dismissed, with the Tribunal supporting the decisions of the CIT(A) and the assessing officer on all grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 15:41:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597695" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 760 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389877</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the assessment order, confirming the treatment of short-term capital gains as business income due to the systematic trading approach of the assessee. The disallowance of expenses was reduced to 15%, and an additional ground regarding income from house property was dismissed as already addressed by the CIT(A). The appeal of the assessee was ultimately dismissed, with the Tribunal supporting the decisions of the CIT(A) and the assessing officer on all grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>