<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 757 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389874</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the deletion of the addition under Section 69B for unexplained investments in immovable properties. It also quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 148, citing the absence of failure to disclose material facts and discrepancies in the approval process. The cross-appeals of the assessee were dismissed, except for one case where the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597690" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 757 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389874</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals, upholding the deletion of the addition under Section 69B for unexplained investments in immovable properties. It also quashed the reopening of the assessment under Section 148, citing the absence of failure to disclose material facts and discrepancies in the approval process. The cross-appeals of the assessee were dismissed, except for one case where the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>