<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 742 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR PROHIBITION OF BENAMI PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS ACT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389859</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order dated 28.03.2019, seeking to quash the impugned order and Provisional Attachment Order related to property ownership in a village. The Appellant argued that the Respondent failed to conduct necessary investigations before issuing the orders, violating procedural requirements under the PBPT Act. The failure to serve notices, lack of communication, and disregard for natural justice principles were highlighted. Ultimately, the impugned order was set aside without costs, emphasizing the significance of procedural compliance and legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597667" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 742 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR PROHIBITION OF BENAMI PROPERTY TRANSACTIONS ACT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389859</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s order dated 28.03.2019, seeking to quash the impugned order and Provisional Attachment Order related to property ownership in a village. The Appellant argued that the Respondent failed to conduct necessary investigations before issuing the orders, violating procedural requirements under the PBPT Act. The failure to serve notices, lack of communication, and disregard for natural justice principles were highlighted. Ultimately, the impugned order was set aside without costs, emphasizing the significance of procedural compliance and legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>