<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 720 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389837</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim on Parking Charges as they were deemed eligible for credit and refund as they were used for providing output services. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Works Contract Services were for fit-out and other works, not new construction, making them fall under &quot;input services.&quot; The Tribunal remanded the issue to verify the eligibility of credit for items like carpets and furniture, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:03:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597635" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 720 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389837</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appellant&#039;s refund claim on Parking Charges as they were deemed eligible for credit and refund as they were used for providing output services. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the Works Contract Services were for fit-out and other works, not new construction, making them fall under &quot;input services.&quot; The Tribunal remanded the issue to verify the eligibility of credit for items like carpets and furniture, partially allowing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389837</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>