https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284951 Later vesting of an estate in a Gaon Sabha under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act did not extinguish the State's continuing legal interest, because vesting remained subject to State control and resumption powers; the State was therefore a person aggrieved with locus standi to appeal under Section 96 CPC. The term "appurtenant" was construed narrowly to mean land necessary for enjoyment of a building as a building, not open land used for a cattle fair, bazar, or mela. Accordingly, only the limited space immediately around the buildings was treated as protected, while the larger fair ground was not appurtenant land. en-us Tue, 02 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Mar 2022 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284951 Later vesting of an estate in a Gaon Sabha under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act did not extinguish the State's continuing legal interest, because vesting remained subject to State control and resumption powers; the State was therefore a person aggrieved with locus standi to appeal under Section 96 CPC. The term "appurtenant" was construed narrowly to mean land necessary for enjoyment of a building as a building, not open land used for a cattle fair, bazar, or mela. Accordingly, only the limited space immediately around the buildings was treated as protected, while the larger fair ground was not appurtenant land. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 02 Nov 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284951