https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284932 The court determined that the partition karar created a trust, with defendant 1 acting as a trustee and the party entitled to payment as a cestui que trust. It was found that an obligation annexed to the ownership of property existed, indicating the creation of a charge. Despite objections regarding the nature of the suit, the court concluded that it was essentially for the enforcement of the trust and upheld the lower courts' decisions in favor of the claimant. en-us Tue, 09 Nov 1926 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2019 18:14:52 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284932 The court determined that the partition karar created a trust, with defendant 1 acting as a trustee and the party entitled to payment as a cestui que trust. It was found that an obligation annexed to the ownership of property existed, indicating the creation of a charge. Despite objections regarding the nature of the suit, the court concluded that it was essentially for the enforcement of the trust and upheld the lower courts' decisions in favor of the claimant. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Nov 1926 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284932