<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20758</link>
    <description>Payment under section 45 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act for delayed tax remittance was treated as penal, not compensatory, because it arose from breach of the statutory obligation to pay on time. As a result, the amount could not be claimed as revenue expenditure or a trade loss and was not deductible in computing business income. The Court followed its earlier ruling on the same issue and reiterated that a payment described as interest remains non-deductible where its true character is a penalty for infraction of law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 22 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20758</link>
      <description>Payment under section 45 of the Gujarat Sales Tax Act for delayed tax remittance was treated as penal, not compensatory, because it arose from breach of the statutory obligation to pay on time. As a result, the amount could not be claimed as revenue expenditure or a trade loss and was not deductible in computing business income. The Court followed its earlier ruling on the same issue and reiterated that a payment described as interest remains non-deductible where its true character is a penalty for infraction of law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>