<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 673 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389790</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the deletion of the disallowance of bank guarantee charges under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that payments to scheduled banks for bank guarantee charges do not attract TDS provisions, citing judicial precedents and legal provisions. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings were considered unfounded, leading to the instruction for the AO to remove the addition of Rs. 10,58,963.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 15:12:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 673 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389790</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi allowed the appeal, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the deletion of the disallowance of bank guarantee charges under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The ITAT held that payments to scheduled banks for bank guarantee charges do not attract TDS provisions, citing judicial precedents and legal provisions. The CIT(A)&#039;s findings were considered unfounded, leading to the instruction for the AO to remove the addition of Rs. 10,58,963.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389790</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>