<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (3) TMI 79 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20754</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the sums paid to the widows of deceased partners constituted the assessee&#039;s income as they were not deductible based on the concept of diversion of income by overriding title. The court concluded that the payments were applications of income and not diversions by overriding title, therefore rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument for deductions. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal was not justified in excluding the sums from the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:48:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59753" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (3) TMI 79 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20754</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay held that the sums paid to the widows of deceased partners constituted the assessee&#039;s income as they were not deductible based on the concept of diversion of income by overriding title. The court concluded that the payments were applications of income and not diversions by overriding title, therefore rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument for deductions. The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal was not justified in excluding the sums from the assessee&#039;s income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20754</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>