<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 667 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389784</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to exclude specific comparables and re-compute the arm&#039;s length price. The issues of liquidated damages and prior period expenditure were remitted for fresh consideration. The Tribunal did not provide detailed analysis on the levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 14:56:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 667 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389784</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to exclude specific comparables and re-compute the arm&#039;s length price. The issues of liquidated damages and prior period expenditure were remitted for fresh consideration. The Tribunal did not provide detailed analysis on the levy of interest and initiation of penalty proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>