<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20753</link>
    <description>The court held that the plot at Railway Road, Karnal, was orally partitioned on October 22, 1970, disrupting the joint Hindu family property. As a result, the members held the property as tenants-in-common, excluding it from the net wealth of the Hindu undivided family. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the plot from assessment was affirmed, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:46:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 37 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20753</link>
      <description>The court held that the plot at Railway Road, Karnal, was orally partitioned on October 22, 1970, disrupting the joint Hindu family property. As a result, the members held the property as tenants-in-common, excluding it from the net wealth of the Hindu undivided family. The Tribunal&#039;s decision to exclude the plot from assessment was affirmed, ruling in favor of the assessee and against the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>