<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (4) TMI 16 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20752</link>
    <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the assessee, Messrs. Oriental Power Cables Ltd., in a case concerning the obligation to deduct tax at source on interest payments under section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee, by maintaining accounts under the mercantile system of accounting and crediting interest to a suspense account rather than individual parties, was not required to deduct tax at source. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument based on a subsequent amendment, stating it was not applicable retroactively. The court awarded costs to the assessee, ruling against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59751" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (4) TMI 16 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20752</link>
      <description>The High Court of Rajasthan ruled in favor of the assessee, Messrs. Oriental Power Cables Ltd., in a case concerning the obligation to deduct tax at source on interest payments under section 194A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee, by maintaining accounts under the mercantile system of accounting and crediting interest to a suspense account rather than individual parties, was not required to deduct tax at source. The court rejected the Revenue&#039;s argument based on a subsequent amendment, stating it was not applicable retroactively. The court awarded costs to the assessee, ruling against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20752</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>