https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389761 The appellant challenged the order seeking recovery of tax amount and interest. The competent Committee directed the appellant to file an appeal against the order dated 29th June 2015, which dropped recovery proceedings but confirmed interest liability. The dispute involved the alleged failure to restrict the utilization of CENVAT credit for taxable and exempted services, the interpretation of the timeframe for credit utilization, and compliance with CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate records and adhering to credit restrictions for taxable and exempted services. en-us Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:21:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389761 The appellant challenged the order seeking recovery of tax amount and interest. The competent Committee directed the appellant to file an appeal against the order dated 29th June 2015, which dropped recovery proceedings but confirmed interest liability. The dispute involved the alleged failure to restrict the utilization of CENVAT credit for taxable and exempted services, the interpretation of the timeframe for credit utilization, and compliance with CENVAT Credit Rules. The Tribunal dismissed Revenue's appeal, emphasizing the importance of maintaining separate records and adhering to credit restrictions for taxable and exempted services. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389761