<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 642 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389759</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case concerning liability for service tax under reverse charge mechanism for services received from foreign commission agents. The appellant, a 100% EOU, was found liable for service tax but was granted waiver of penalties due to a reasonable error in non-payment without intent to evade tax. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the importance of considering circumstances and cenvat credit availability for tax payment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:21:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 642 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389759</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, in a case concerning liability for service tax under reverse charge mechanism for services received from foreign commission agents. The appellant, a 100% EOU, was found liable for service tax but was granted waiver of penalties due to a reasonable error in non-payment without intent to evade tax. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing the importance of considering circumstances and cenvat credit availability for tax payment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389759</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>