<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 639 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellants as the Revenue failed to establish the correct classification of the products, leading to the dismissal of the demand for duty. Penalties and fines associated with the demand were also dismissed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal to impose a redemption fine and increase the penalty was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597484" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 639 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the appellants as the Revenue failed to establish the correct classification of the products, leading to the dismissal of the demand for duty. Penalties and fines associated with the demand were also dismissed. The Revenue&#039;s appeal to impose a redemption fine and increase the penalty was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>