<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (10) TMI 512 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284927</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision to quash disciplinary proceedings initiated by the appellant-Corporation against respondents for supplying substandard crates. The Court found no undue delay in initiating or conducting the proceedings, noting compliance with Vigilance Manual directives and appointment of Enquiry Officers. The High Court&#039;s observations were deemed incorrect as Enquiry Officers were appointed and proceedings had progressed. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, the High Court&#039;s judgments were set aside, and the writ petitions by respondents were dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:17:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (10) TMI 512 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284927</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court overturned the Delhi High Court&#039;s decision to quash disciplinary proceedings initiated by the appellant-Corporation against respondents for supplying substandard crates. The Court found no undue delay in initiating or conducting the proceedings, noting compliance with Vigilance Manual directives and appointment of Enquiry Officers. The High Court&#039;s observations were deemed incorrect as Enquiry Officers were appointed and proceedings had progressed. Consequently, the appeals were allowed, the High Court&#039;s judgments were set aside, and the writ petitions by respondents were dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>