<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 636 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389753</link>
    <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Jabil Circuit India Pvt Ltd, finding that the demand for central excise duties and penalties imposed under rule 10A were not justified. The tribunal determined that the transactions did not fall within the scope of rule 10A concerning job-work arrangements. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the previous order was set aside during the pronouncement on 08/11/2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:15:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 636 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389753</link>
      <description>The tribunal ruled in favor of M/s Jabil Circuit India Pvt Ltd, finding that the demand for central excise duties and penalties imposed under rule 10A were not justified. The tribunal determined that the transactions did not fall within the scope of rule 10A concerning job-work arrangements. As a result, the appeals were allowed, and the previous order was set aside during the pronouncement on 08/11/2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389753</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>