<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PAN: case of I-VEN INTERACTIVE LIMITED (SC)- ADDRESS OF ASSESSEE - NOTICE SERVED AT ADDRESS AS PER PAN RECORD HELD VALID BY THE SUPREME COURT- VITAL DIRECTLY RELEVANT PROVISIONS NOT AT ALL REFERRED AND CONSIDERED SO JUDGMENT NEED RECONSIDERATION.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8857</link>
    <description>Notices under Section 143(2) are properly issued to the address in the PAN database unless the assessee has specifically intimated the Assessing Officer of a change in name, address or nature of business; mere mention of a new address in return filings or filings with the Registrar of Companies does not substitute for updating PAN records and formally notifying the Assessing Officer under Section 139A(5)(d). The author highlights that PAN specific provisions were not considered in the discussed judgments and urges updating PAN data to ensure valid service under automated notice issuance systems.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:30:25 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:30:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PAN: case of I-VEN INTERACTIVE LIMITED (SC)- ADDRESS OF ASSESSEE - NOTICE SERVED AT ADDRESS AS PER PAN RECORD HELD VALID BY THE SUPREME COURT- VITAL DIRECTLY RELEVANT PROVISIONS NOT AT ALL REFERRED AND CONSIDERED SO JUDGMENT NEED RECONSIDERATION.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8857</link>
      <description>Notices under Section 143(2) are properly issued to the address in the PAN database unless the assessee has specifically intimated the Assessing Officer of a change in name, address or nature of business; mere mention of a new address in return filings or filings with the Registrar of Companies does not substitute for updating PAN records and formally notifying the Assessing Officer under Section 139A(5)(d). The author highlights that PAN specific provisions were not considered in the discussed judgments and urges updating PAN data to ensure valid service under automated notice issuance systems.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2019 09:30:25 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>