<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1967 (8) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284904</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the competent authority must provide the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to show cause before making a decision under Fundamental Rule 54. The absence of such an opportunity rendered the original order invalid, emphasizing the need to adhere to principles of natural justice and fair play. The ruling set aside the High Court&#039;s decision, directing a fresh consideration with due process and awarding costs to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:17:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597438" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1967 (8) TMI 130 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284904</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the competent authority must provide the appellant with a reasonable opportunity to show cause before making a decision under Fundamental Rule 54. The absence of such an opportunity rendered the original order invalid, emphasizing the need to adhere to principles of natural justice and fair play. The ruling set aside the High Court&#039;s decision, directing a fresh consideration with due process and awarding costs to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 1967 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284904</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>