https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284899 The court concluded that the plaintiff's suit was barred by estoppel as he was estopped from contending that Gangabai had the right to adopt him. Despite lower courts finding the adoption valid, the court held that the plaintiff's acceptance of Rs. 8,000 as part of a compromise, which declared Gangabai had lost her adoption rights, created an estoppel. As a result, the plaintiff was not entitled to relief, and the court reversed the decree in favor of the plaintiff, dismissing the suit with costs throughout. en-us Fri, 03 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Dec 2019 13:07:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284899 The court concluded that the plaintiff's suit was barred by estoppel as he was estopped from contending that Gangabai had the right to adopt him. Despite lower courts finding the adoption valid, the court held that the plaintiff's acceptance of Rs. 8,000 as part of a compromise, which declared Gangabai had lost her adoption rights, created an estoppel. As a result, the plaintiff was not entitled to relief, and the court reversed the decree in favor of the plaintiff, dismissing the suit with costs throughout. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Oct 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284899