https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389743 Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits appeals only from orders specifically listed, so an order returning a Section 34 petition for filing before the competent court is not appealable as it is neither an order setting aside nor refusing to set aside an award. The Commercial Courts Act supplies the forum but does not expand the substantive right of appeal. On seat jurisdiction, where the arbitration clause fixes New Delhi as the juridical seat, the territorial principle and party autonomy give the courts at that seat exclusive supervisory jurisdiction over the Section 34 challenge. The petition therefore had to be presented before the competent court at New Delhi. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Oct 2022 15:06:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389743 Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act permits appeals only from orders specifically listed, so an order returning a Section 34 petition for filing before the competent court is not appealable as it is neither an order setting aside nor refusing to set aside an award. The Commercial Courts Act supplies the forum but does not expand the substantive right of appeal. On seat jurisdiction, where the arbitration clause fixes New Delhi as the juridical seat, the territorial principle and party autonomy give the courts at that seat exclusive supervisory jurisdiction over the Section 34 challenge. The petition therefore had to be presented before the competent court at New Delhi. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389743