<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (3) TMI 14 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20740</link>
    <description>Printing rolls were held not to fall within the depreciation entry for &quot;patterns&quot;, &quot;dies&quot; or &quot;templates&quot; in Appendix I, Part I(III) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Applying the ordinary meanings of those terms, the court noted that a printing roll is only the substrate on which engraving is later done and is neither the model, the embossing instrument, nor the guide from which a design is formed; separate allowance of engraving charges did not change that character. The higher depreciation rate of 30 per cent. was therefore unavailable, and the asset was confined to depreciation at 10 per cent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2025 11:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (3) TMI 14 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20740</link>
      <description>Printing rolls were held not to fall within the depreciation entry for &quot;patterns&quot;, &quot;dies&quot; or &quot;templates&quot; in Appendix I, Part I(III) of the Income-tax Rules, 1962. Applying the ordinary meanings of those terms, the court noted that a printing roll is only the substrate on which engraving is later done and is neither the model, the embossing instrument, nor the guide from which a design is formed; separate allowance of engraving charges did not change that character. The higher depreciation rate of 30 per cent. was therefore unavailable, and the asset was confined to depreciation at 10 per cent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20740</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>