<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 620 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389737</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Central Excise Duty demand and penalties imposed on the company and its director due to lack of concrete evidence supporting allegations of clandestine removal. The judgment highlighted the importance of specific and consistent show cause notices and emphasized the requirement for substantial evidence to substantiate charges. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:49:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 620 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389737</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Central Excise Duty demand and penalties imposed on the company and its director due to lack of concrete evidence supporting allegations of clandestine removal. The judgment highlighted the importance of specific and consistent show cause notices and emphasized the requirement for substantial evidence to substantiate charges. The appellant&#039;s appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389737</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>