https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389721 The tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeal)'s decision and allowed the appellant's appeal. The tribunal held that the appellant's reversal of Cenvat credit and payment of interest related to trading activity post the Show Cause Notice adjudication complied with Rule 6(3A), thereby negating the liability for payment under Rule 6(3). By analyzing relevant legal precedents, including judgments from CESTAT Ahmedabad and the Supreme Court, the tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions aligned with legal requirements, leading to the favorable outcome of the appeal. en-us Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:48:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389721 The tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeal)'s decision and allowed the appellant's appeal. The tribunal held that the appellant's reversal of Cenvat credit and payment of interest related to trading activity post the Show Cause Notice adjudication complied with Rule 6(3A), thereby negating the liability for payment under Rule 6(3). By analyzing relevant legal precedents, including judgments from CESTAT Ahmedabad and the Supreme Court, the tribunal concluded that the appellant's actions aligned with legal requirements, leading to the favorable outcome of the appeal. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389721