<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 602 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389719</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order entirely. The CIT(A) found the arm&#039;s length price for the transfer of goods between units was not adequately demonstrated, rejected certificates issued by a practicing Cost Accountant, and upheld various expense allocations. The Tribunal agreed with the findings, dismissing the appeal and affirming the adjustments made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:48:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597365" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 602 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389719</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s order entirely. The CIT(A) found the arm&#039;s length price for the transfer of goods between units was not adequately demonstrated, rejected certificates issued by a practicing Cost Accountant, and upheld various expense allocations. The Tribunal agreed with the findings, dismissing the appeal and affirming the adjustments made by the Assessing Officer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389719</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>