https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389717 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adequately consider evidence presented by the Appellant regarding the integrated nature of the project, violating natural justice. The AO's decision to disallow expenses and make additions on alleged land sale gains was also set aside as it did not properly consider the evidence provided by the Appellant. Both appeals by the Appellant were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of a fair assessment process and consideration of all evidence. en-us Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:48:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389717 The Tribunal set aside the CIT(A)'s order and remanded the case back to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration. The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) did not adequately consider evidence presented by the Appellant regarding the integrated nature of the project, violating natural justice. The AO's decision to disallow expenses and make additions on alleged land sale gains was also set aside as it did not properly consider the evidence provided by the Appellant. Both appeals by the Appellant were allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of a fair assessment process and consideration of all evidence. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389717