https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284874 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 77,200 due to cash found at the residence, considering family circumstances. However, the appeals on unexplained jewellery investment, undeclared business income, and low household expense drawings were dismissed. The Revenue's appeal was entirely dismissed, and the seized cash was directed to adjust towards advance tax liability. The order was issued on January 15, 2016. en-us Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 Dec 2019 10:05:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284874 The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal regarding the addition of Rs. 77,200 due to cash found at the residence, considering family circumstances. However, the appeals on unexplained jewellery investment, undeclared business income, and low household expense drawings were dismissed. The Revenue's appeal was entirely dismissed, and the seized cash was directed to adjust towards advance tax liability. The order was issued on January 15, 2016. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 15 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284874