<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (8) TMI 1588 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284883</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. The sales tax subsidy was classified as a capital receipt, the adoption of different market values for Section 80IA(8) was permitted, and the sale proceeds from Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) were treated as capital receipts, not subject to tax under business income or capital gains.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 10:05:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597331" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (8) TMI 1588 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284883</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the assessee on all issues. The sales tax subsidy was classified as a capital receipt, the adoption of different market values for Section 80IA(8) was permitted, and the sale proceeds from Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) were treated as capital receipts, not subject to tax under business income or capital gains.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284883</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>