<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 574 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389691</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E for periods before 01/06/2015 was not legally sustainable. Relying on the Karnataka High Court&#039;s decision, the Tribunal favored the appellant&#039;s position, emphasizing that in the absence of a jurisdictional High Court ruling, the view favorable to the assessee should be adopted. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the late fees imposed by the Assessing Officer were annulled.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 574 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389691</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the levy of late fees under Section 234E for periods before 01/06/2015 was not legally sustainable. Relying on the Karnataka High Court&#039;s decision, the Tribunal favored the appellant&#039;s position, emphasizing that in the absence of a jurisdictional High Court ruling, the view favorable to the assessee should be adopted. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the late fees imposed by the Assessing Officer were annulled.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389691</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>