<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389682</link>
    <description>The Adjudicating Authority admitted the Company&#039;s petition under section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a private limited company for payment default. A moratorium under section 14 of the IBC was ordered, protecting the company&#039;s assets. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed to manage the company during the resolution process. The Operational Creditor was required to deposit funds for expenses, subject to approval. The judgment stressed compliance with IBC regulations, timely document submission, and communication with regulatory authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 13:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 565 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389682</link>
      <description>The Adjudicating Authority admitted the Company&#039;s petition under section 9 of the Insolvency &amp;amp; Bankruptcy Code, 2016, initiating Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process against a private limited company for payment default. A moratorium under section 14 of the IBC was ordered, protecting the company&#039;s assets. An Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) was appointed to manage the company during the resolution process. The Operational Creditor was required to deposit funds for expenses, subject to approval. The judgment stressed compliance with IBC regulations, timely document submission, and communication with regulatory authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389682</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>