<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 558 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389675</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the recovery made by the employer from the employee&#039;s salary for breaching the employment contract was not subject to service tax. The decision set aside the order demanding service tax, allowing the employer&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal members, HON&#039;BLE MRS. ARCHANA WADHWA and HON&#039;BLE MR. ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR, presided over the case with representatives from both parties present.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 10:52:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597257" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 558 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389675</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the recovery made by the employer from the employee&#039;s salary for breaching the employment contract was not subject to service tax. The decision set aside the order demanding service tax, allowing the employer&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal members, HON&#039;BLE MRS. ARCHANA WADHWA and HON&#039;BLE MR. ANIL G. SHAKKARWAR, presided over the case with representatives from both parties present.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389675</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>