https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389669 The SC determined that the Division Bench's reference was misaligned with the appellant's challenge concerning the vires of Rule 5 under Section 3-A of the Act and Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the SC remitted the case back to the Division Bench to address the original legal questions, ensuring a thorough examination of the validity of Rule 5. The SC also instructed the Division Bench to resolve additional related issues from the initial judgment. The appeals and associated matters were disposed of, facilitating a comprehensive legal review. en-us Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 07 Nov 2024 13:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389669 The SC determined that the Division Bench's reference was misaligned with the appellant's challenge concerning the vires of Rule 5 under Section 3-A of the Act and Article 14 of the Constitution. Consequently, the SC remitted the case back to the Division Bench to address the original legal questions, ensuring a thorough examination of the validity of Rule 5. The SC also instructed the Division Bench to resolve additional related issues from the initial judgment. The appeals and associated matters were disposed of, facilitating a comprehensive legal review. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 05 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389669