<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 546 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389663</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Central Excise duty, penalty, and interest against the appellant and its Director. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the need for strict adherence to legal procedures and the requirement of corroborative evidence to substantiate charges of clandestine removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 10:35:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 546 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389663</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand of Central Excise duty, penalty, and interest against the appellant and its Director. The appeals were allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. The Tribunal emphasized the need for strict adherence to legal procedures and the requirement of corroborative evidence to substantiate charges of clandestine removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389663</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>