<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (12) TMI 1740 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284861</link>
    <description>A statutory review, once validly exercised by the competent committee and concluded by a decision not to appeal, could not be reopened by a later committee in the absence of express authority; the subsequent direction to file appeals was therefore unsustainable. The review was also made beyond the prescribed period under Section 129D(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, and no power existed to condone such delay in review. On both grounds, the revenue appeals were not maintainable and the order in favour of the assessee remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 10:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (12) TMI 1740 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284861</link>
      <description>A statutory review, once validly exercised by the competent committee and concluded by a decision not to appeal, could not be reopened by a later committee in the absence of express authority; the subsequent direction to file appeals was therefore unsustainable. The review was also made beyond the prescribed period under Section 129D(3) of the Customs Act, 1962, and no power existed to condone such delay in review. On both grounds, the revenue appeals were not maintainable and the order in favour of the assessee remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284861</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>