<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (10) TMI 1290 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284857</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on a partner of a Customs House Agent (CHA) firm under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 for facilitating fraudulent exports through an unauthorized person. The Tribunal emphasized that vicarious responsibility cannot be imposed on an individual partner and criticized the lack of due deliberation in applying penalties. The decision underscored the need for careful consideration before imposing penalties and highlighted the importance of upholding legal principles in such cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Dec 2019 10:05:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (10) TMI 1290 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284857</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed on a partner of a Customs House Agent (CHA) firm under Section 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 for facilitating fraudulent exports through an unauthorized person. The Tribunal emphasized that vicarious responsibility cannot be imposed on an individual partner and criticized the lack of due deliberation in applying penalties. The decision underscored the need for careful consideration before imposing penalties and highlighted the importance of upholding legal principles in such cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284857</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>