https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284854 The court ruled in favor of the defendant petitioner, setting aside the earlier order and declaring that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The court held that the matters raised fell within the purview of the Companies Act, emphasizing that only the court specified in Section 10 of the Act had jurisdiction over such issues. The plaintiff was directed to present the case to the appropriate court if desired, with no costs awarded. en-us Tue, 23 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284854 The court ruled in favor of the defendant petitioner, setting aside the earlier order and declaring that the court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The court held that the matters raised fell within the purview of the Companies Act, emphasizing that only the court specified in Section 10 of the Act had jurisdiction over such issues. The plaintiff was directed to present the case to the appropriate court if desired, with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 23 Dec 1975 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284854