<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1921 (9) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284849</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeals against orders for attachment before judgment as the defendants were not obstructing or delaying any decree. The appellants, substantial merchants, provided evidence supporting their position, while the plaintiff failed to substantiate their claims. The attachment was lifted, and the appellants were awarded costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1921 (9) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284849</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeals against orders for attachment before judgment as the defendants were not obstructing or delaying any decree. The appellants, substantial merchants, provided evidence supporting their position, while the plaintiff failed to substantiate their claims. The attachment was lifted, and the appellants were awarded costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>