<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1921 (9) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284849</link>
    <description>Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 bars the trial of a suit when the same matter is directly and substantially in issue in a prior suit, but it does not prevent interlocutory relief such as injunction, receiver, or attachment before judgment. Attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 requires specific material showing that the defendant intends to obstruct or delay execution by removing or disposing of property; vague allegations are insufficient and further evidence may be needed before ex parte relief. On the stated facts, the materials did not establish the requisite intent, so the attachment was set aside and security discharged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 15:11:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1921 (9) TMI 1 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284849</link>
      <description>Section 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 bars the trial of a suit when the same matter is directly and substantially in issue in a prior suit, but it does not prevent interlocutory relief such as injunction, receiver, or attachment before judgment. Attachment before judgment under Order XXXVIII, Rule 5 requires specific material showing that the defendant intends to obstruct or delay execution by removing or disposing of property; vague allegations are insufficient and further evidence may be needed before ex parte relief. On the stated facts, the materials did not establish the requisite intent, so the attachment was set aside and security discharged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 1921 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284849</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>