https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284847 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Central Government's acquisition of the property, ruling that the petitioners had no valid claim to ownership or compensation. The court upheld previous decisions confirming the government's acquisition, rejecting the petitioners' claims based on a subsequent sale deed. It was held that the compensation deposited by the Income Tax Department on behalf of the Union of India was valid, and only the legal heirs of the former owner were entitled to it. The court imposed costs on the petitioners for persisting with litigation despite repeated losses in prior proceedings. en-us Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Dec 2019 13:42:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284847 The court dismissed the petition challenging the Central Government's acquisition of the property, ruling that the petitioners had no valid claim to ownership or compensation. The court upheld previous decisions confirming the government's acquisition, rejecting the petitioners' claims based on a subsequent sale deed. It was held that the compensation deposited by the Income Tax Department on behalf of the Union of India was valid, and only the legal heirs of the former owner were entitled to it. The court imposed costs on the petitioners for persisting with litigation despite repeated losses in prior proceedings. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284847