<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (10) TMI 30 - ORISSA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20717</link>
    <description>The court set aside the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order treating a remittance as &quot;fees for technical services&quot; instead of salary or exempt income. The court directed a reconsideration by the Officer based on the nature of services provided, rejecting claims for exemption under specific sections. The matter was remitted for further examination without costs awarded. Judge K. C. JAGADEB Roy J. concurred with the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:23:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59716" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (10) TMI 30 - ORISSA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20717</link>
      <description>The court set aside the Income-tax Officer&#039;s order treating a remittance as &quot;fees for technical services&quot; instead of salary or exempt income. The court directed a reconsideration by the Officer based on the nature of services provided, rejecting claims for exemption under specific sections. The matter was remitted for further examination without costs awarded. Judge K. C. JAGADEB Roy J. concurred with the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20717</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>