<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 529 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389646</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and reducing the forfeiture of the security deposit to Rs. 1 lakh. The Commissioner was directed to restore the CHA license within a week of the deposit, with the period of revocation extended for the duration it remained revoked. The appeal was granted in part due to the disproportionate nature of the penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597122" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 529 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389646</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in part, setting aside the revocation of the CHA license and reducing the forfeiture of the security deposit to Rs. 1 lakh. The Commissioner was directed to restore the CHA license within a week of the deposit, with the period of revocation extended for the duration it remained revoked. The appeal was granted in part due to the disproportionate nature of the penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389646</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>