<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 520 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389637</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer, by setting aside the demand for 6% of the value of bagasse under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Citing a High Court judgment, the Tribunal confirmed that Rule 6 is inapplicable to bagasse, thus allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Nov 2024 13:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 520 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389637</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer, by setting aside the demand for 6% of the value of bagasse under Rule 6(3) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. Citing a High Court judgment, the Tribunal confirmed that Rule 6 is inapplicable to bagasse, thus allowing the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389637</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>