<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Sales Tax Department Challenges Resolution Plan in Insolvency Case, Argues Claims Differ from ESIC and Provident Fund Contributions.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50692</link>
    <description>Validity of Resolution plan - the Appellant - &#039;Sales Tax Department&#039; claim an Operational Creditor cannot equated with the ESIC Employees Contribution; ESIC Employers Contribution; Provident Fund Employees and Provident Fund Employers and no discrimination can be alleged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 09:51:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 09:51:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597098" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Sales Tax Department Challenges Resolution Plan in Insolvency Case, Argues Claims Differ from ESIC and Provident Fund Contributions.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50692</link>
      <description>Validity of Resolution plan - the Appellant - &#039;Sales Tax Department&#039; claim an Operational Creditor cannot equated with the ESIC Employees Contribution; ESIC Employers Contribution; Provident Fund Employees and Provident Fund Employers and no discrimination can be alleged.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Dec 2019 09:51:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=50692</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>