<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (11) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20710</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the tax treatment of the written down value of the building as a capital receipt and upheld the ruling on not allowing the deduction of surtax in determining total income. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the capital nature of the transaction and procedural limitations on raising additional grounds during the appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:11:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=59709" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (11) TMI 28 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20710</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the tax treatment of the written down value of the building as a capital receipt and upheld the ruling on not allowing the deduction of surtax in determining total income. The judgment favored the assessee, emphasizing the capital nature of the transaction and procedural limitations on raising additional grounds during the appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=20710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>