<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (8) TMI 1188 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284829</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the disallowance of remuneration to partners by treating the firm as an Association of Persons (AOP) under Sec.184(5) of the IT Act, 1961 was not justified. The Tribunal found that the returns filed in response to notices under Sec. 148 were compliant with the requirements under Sec. 139, and there was no failure under Sec. 143(2). Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that Sec.184(5) applied only in cases of complete failure under Sec.144, leading to the deletion of the disallowance of remuneration for the assessment years in question. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:50:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (8) TMI 1188 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284829</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal held that the disallowance of remuneration to partners by treating the firm as an Association of Persons (AOP) under Sec.184(5) of the IT Act, 1961 was not justified. The Tribunal found that the returns filed in response to notices under Sec. 148 were compliant with the requirements under Sec. 139, and there was no failure under Sec. 143(2). Therefore, the Tribunal concluded that Sec.184(5) applied only in cases of complete failure under Sec.144, leading to the deletion of the disallowance of remuneration for the assessment years in question. The appeals of the assessee were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284829</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>