<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (2) TMI 1370 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284828</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 3,81,383 on account of gross profit in the individual&#039;s hands and take necessary action in the firm&#039;s hands. Additionally, the peak credit addition was restricted to Rs. 10,60,742 instead of the total amount of Rs. 18,02,087. The bank account was deemed to belong to a partnership firm based on the partnership deed&#039;s clauses. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 13th Feb., 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:50:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597084" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (2) TMI 1370 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284828</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 3,81,383 on account of gross profit in the individual&#039;s hands and take necessary action in the firm&#039;s hands. Additionally, the peak credit addition was restricted to Rs. 10,60,742 instead of the total amount of Rs. 18,02,087. The bank account was deemed to belong to a partnership firm based on the partnership deed&#039;s clauses. As a result, the appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the order was pronounced in favor of the assessee on 13th Feb., 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=284828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>