<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (12) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389629</link>
    <description>The challenge concerned rejection of a request to file or revise TRAN-1 under the transitional provisions of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court noted that the issue was no longer res integra because an earlier order had already extended the filing or revision period for registered persons up to 31.12.2019. On that basis, the petitioner fell within the extended period and could avail the relief. The department&#039;s rejection therefore did not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 16:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=597076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (12) TMI 512 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389629</link>
      <description>The challenge concerned rejection of a request to file or revise TRAN-1 under the transitional provisions of the CGST Act, 2017. The Court noted that the issue was no longer res integra because an earlier order had already extended the filing or revision period for registered persons up to 31.12.2019. On that basis, the petitioner fell within the extended period and could avail the relief. The department&#039;s rejection therefore did not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389629</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>