https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389624 Interference with a remand order was declined where the Tribunal sent the assessment back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after permitting both sides to lead evidence. The Court noted that the assessee had taken inconsistent stands on the cash payments and the alleged intermediary, but the remand did not finally confirm the addition or cause legal prejudice. As the order merely enabled reconsideration on the evidence on record, no illegality was found in the Tribunal's course, and the assessment was left to be decided afresh. en-us Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 Dec 2019 16:33:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389624 Interference with a remand order was declined where the Tribunal sent the assessment back to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after permitting both sides to lead evidence. The Court noted that the assessee had taken inconsistent stands on the cash payments and the alleged intermediary, but the remand did not finally confirm the addition or cause legal prejudice. As the order merely enabled reconsideration on the evidence on record, no illegality was found in the Tribunal's course, and the assessment was left to be decided afresh. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 02 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=389624